2014年11月14日 星期五

Lunch with the FT: Guo Guangchang


2014.11.14
Over vegetarian food, the billionaire behind China’s biggest private conglomerate talks about Cultural Revolution-era cuisine, learning from eastern and western sages, and what tai chi and investing have in common
W
hen a rich Chinese businessman is about to enter a room, my radar usually picks it up well in advance – the give-away is the sound of underlings tripping over themselves in the corridor to get out of the great man’s path.
But there’s no scurrying and kowtowing before Guo Guangchang arrives for lunch in the management canteen of his headquarters at the unfashionable end of the Shanghai Bund. Suddenly he’s just there, a slight bespectacled man looking like a cross between a librarian and the migrant worker he might have been – if he hadn’t built an $8bn conglomerate.
Guo Guangchang illustration for Lunch with the FT by James Ferguson
Guo is not China’s richest man; nor is he the flashiest, nor – according to him – even the cleverest. But in his 47 years, he has risen from peasant penury to having so much money that the desire to be rich no longer gets him up in the morning.
Fosun, the group he co-founded with three university friends in 1992, is the largest private conglomerate in China. It owns big stakes in the Shanghai hospital where my children get their flu shots, the cake shop where they get their birthday cakes, the holiday village where they’d love to spend half-term, quite apart from a fair amount of the ground we walk on (through its vast Shanghai property holdings).
It has also recently tried (and failed) to buy Forbes magazine, is trying (and will probably manage) to buy Club Med and has already bought Portugal’s largest insurance group, Caixa Seguros. Fosun has made 12 overseas acquisitions so far this year and there’s a good chance it will be coming to a country near you soon, looking to buy a company you know well. So this seems the ideal time to try to figure out what makes Guo Guangchang tick.
According to Guo, it’s a mixture of Buddhism, Daoism, Confucianism, and Warren Buffett. He says he finds inspiration for his investment decisions from China’s oldest sages (and that other one from Omaha). He is also a devotee of tai chi, the Asian martial art that he practises as often as he can. But the first thing we discuss is food – and not just because we’re having lunch.
Like many Chinese of his generation, however, Guo seems more nostalgic than critical of those darkest days of China’s recent history. He becomes positively lyrical on the topic of his mother’s signature dish from that period, meigancai(literally translated as “mouldy dried vegetables”), which he says tastes best with a generous dollop of pork lard.Food (and the lack thereof) was a big issue in China when Guo was born in the eastern province of Zhejiang in 1967. The country had recently embarked on Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution, resulting in widespread economic and social turmoil. He recalls that his family weren’t starving but neither were they banqueting (basic foods were rationed by how much each family contributed to their Communist production team). “We could definitely eat our fill but the food could be very bad,” he says, recalling how his mother “used to plant sweet potatoes secretly to feed us”.

Podcast



FT News podcast logo
Patti Waldmeir talks to Guo Guangchang about his philosophy of life and about getting rich in China.
“We were poor then. We used to steam a bowl of rice and then put one layer of meigancai on top of the rice. Then the pork fat would melt into the rice. It smelled very good. Even today, it still makes my mouth water whenever I think about it,” he says, “meigancai is our nostalgia.”
As well as acting like Guo’s own version of Proust’s madeleine, this sun-dried pickle also became his staple ration at boarding school: in China most rural children, including those from peasant families like Guo’s, have no choice but to board in the nearest town if they are to attend school at all. His mother loaded a pot of meigancai with lard and as many pieces of pork as the family could spare, and he carried enough to school to last the whole week.
He roars with delight when I ask whether we’ll be eating meigancai at our lunch, served in a private room of Fosun’s free all-vegetarian management canteen. But it seems we won’t – not because this earthy dish is not grand enough but because it’s not vegetarian enough. As he slurps a bowl of steaming handmade noodles, and takes an oversized mouthful of the kind of sweet potato his mother used to plant, I ask Guo if he is a vegetarian. He says he isn’t, though he spent a month off meat when he was mourning his mother’s death, since she was a devout Buddhist. If possible, he also eats a meat-free meal in the canteen every day at lunchtime.
Today’s fare is cold steamed sweetcorn, sautéed winter melon with black mushrooms, okra, spinach, and potato with cowpea. At most business lunches in China this would be lubricated by a type of firewater known as baijiu, but not here. It’s all part of the Guo approach to life and getting rich – do nothing by extremes, whether it’s food, drink or market speculation. Tai chi, he continues, is about keeping the extremes of yin and yang in balance.
What, I ask, has all this got to do with buying Portuguese insurance companies? Guo takes a stab at explaining how it applies to his investment decisions.
“The aim of tai chi is not to strike first to gain dominance over an opponent but to wait and hit at the right moment,” he says. “That is, to be the first one to take action after feeling the change in momentum. Investing is similar to doing tai chi. No one holds a permanent speed advantage in the market due to the limits of human intelligence and vision. Your advantage comes from your ability to feel the change faster and take decisive action faster.”
Though any tai chi master worth his salt will tell you that it takes years to understand the first thing about this martial-cum-spiritual art form – and I know I have only grasped a fraction of his meaning – I do have some idea of the whole “feel the change” thing. Having recently tried tai chi, I learnt how, by simply extending one finger down my outer thigh, I could alter my balance to the point where even the instructor’s determined pummelling couldn’t topple me.
Guo says he used to practise tai chi almost every day; even now that he’s too busy to practise more than a couple of times a week, he “can still do tai chi even by sitting” – including while having lunch, it seems. “You see, I rarely sit like this,” he says, slouching for emphasis. “I usually sit like this,” he explains, perching upright on the edge of the chair. “In this way, your qi is flowing smoothly inside your body.” He adds that this helps him “have a good mental outlook” and “recover from general physical complaints”.
My grasp of the Chinese medico-spiritual concept of qi or “spirit” is about as weak as my grasp of tai chi. But Guo is so intent on helping me understand that he breaks into a rare bit of English to insist, “If you just practise the movements for five or 10 minutes, it’s good for your health. Even sometimes during conference calls, I listen to the other side while practising some movements,” he says. Staff say he’s been known to break into spontaneous tai chi in the coffee breaks during tough dealmaking sessions.
. . .
The influence of eastern spirituality on his investment strategy doesn’t end here. Buddhism, Guo explains, teaches you that “everything starts from your heart, and feeling the heart of others is the most important doctrine in Buddhism. In doing business that means seeing things through other people’s eyes. I feel that doing business is just like practising Buddhism. Money is not your only purpose. Your purpose is to make things better for other people, and in the end, money will come as a result.”

Fosun Corporate Building


2 East Fuxing Road Shanghai, 200010
Spinach
Okra
Mushroom and wax gourd
Potato and cowpea
Vegetable noodle soup
Sweet potato
Sweetcorn
Total: Free
“Business,” he adds, “is also the best form of charity” (or that is what he tells Buddhists who come asking for donations). “By making a company successful, you can provide more employment, and, if you treat your staff well, then your business itself becomes a charity.”
Guo has been quoted as saying that intelligence isn’t the key to wealth. Instead, this is something known as xinli. It’s a term that many otherwise articulate people struggle to translate; this is how Guo explains it: “Some people make the wrong decisions but that’s not because they don’t have superior intelligence but because they can’t resist the temptation of the monsters hiding in their heart.”
For example, “Many people bought subordinated debt in the US before the subprime crisis when they knew clearly it was problematic but they knew if they didn’t buy it, their bonus that year would be reduced, so they made a decision based on short-term interests, not because they were ignorant of the risk.” Those people didn’t have xinli. Admitting when you’ve made a mistake is another form of xinli, he says – even if you are the chief executive and you think you should always be right. Think of Forrest Gump, he says: “He wasn’t intelligent but he was very successful”.
Guo also uses the example of Warren Buffett, the man on whom he has modelled his strategy of building a conglomerate that uses insurance funds to invest in widely diverse businesses. “I don’t think he’s been successful because he is smarter than others,” says Guo. It’s more about investment discipline, sensitivity to the market, and taking the long view, he adds. Those things, it seems, are also xinli.
Buddhism and Buffettism aside, there is another sage whom Guo credits with his success: Deng Xiaoping, the leader who steered China through wide-ranging economic reforms after Mao’s death and who is famous for his (possibly apocryphal) saying, “To get rich is glorious”. Guo says: “If [Deng] hadn’t distributed the land to the peasants, we would never have had enough food to eat. Most [villages] in Zhejiang were starving”. He says that, without Deng’s reforms, he could never have attended university, “and then there would be no Fosun”.
For Guo’s company name reflects his treasured university education: Fosun means “star of Fudan University”, his alma mater and Shanghai’s most prestigious academic institution. But he didn’t just get a philosophy degree from Fudan: he honed his business skills there by selling bread to hungry classmates when they finished studying at 11 each night. He earned Rmb5 a night, which seems a paltry sum until he points out that his monthly expenses were only Rmb30 at that time.
After graduation in 1989, he had planned to study overseas but, instead, used the tuition money to found Fosun with three classmates (all of whom remain involved). Today, 22 years after the company was founded, it has investments from steel to mining, tourism to pharmaceuticals.
I hope you can understand we were poor for a very long time. I hope you can understand our desire for a good life and money. Let’s not rush to criticise that
This kind of “Zhejiang-to-riches” tale is not totally unheard of in modern China: Jack Ma, founder of internet giant Alibaba, is also a Zhejiang boy – and a fellow fan of tai chi. Guo is often compared with Ma but the Fosun chief says he’s not as clever as the ecommerce tycoon (nor, for that matter, so good at tai chi): “No one is as smart as Jack Ma,” Guo says, exploding with mirth. “He’s a . . . what do you call it . . . an alien. I’m just a normal guy,” albeit one with a personal wealth of $4.3bn, according to Forbes’ China Rich List.
Talk turns to more recent developments. Fosun has been battling for more than a year to take majority control of French holiday chain Club Med, and it recently paid $725m to buy New York’s Chase Manhattan Plaza. But its most important strategic move recently was to spend €1bn buying Caixa Seguros, an insurance group that gives him the funds he needs to buy overseas companies that can capitalise on China’s growing affluence, such as Club Med, without taking on more debt at a time when rating agencies already say Fosun has too much borrowing.
“Owning that insurance company means we own €13bn in insurance assets that we can use for investment,” he says, adding that assets from the Portuguese group funded Fosun’s $100m stake in Alibaba’s recent US listing. But, I say, you can’t just milk the Portuguese company for funds, you also have to sell insurance to Portuguese people (and deal with insurance regulations that are very different from those in China), isn’t that a bit difficult? “It’s not the first time we have invested in an insurance company. We understand insurance,” says Guo. This has the ring of famous last words but his confidence won’t be shaken. Buffett uses insurance to drive investment, and Guo is determined to do that too.
It’s time to finish up but Guo has hardly touched his noodles, and I still want to know: what does a boy who grew up in a peasant family during the Cultural Revolution think about the current state of the soon-to-be biggest economy on earth? Pundits wring their hands over greed, ostentation, and the decline of traditional values. Is Guo worried that China will just collapse under the weight of its own acquisitiveness?
He rebukes me gently. “I hope you can understand that we were poor for a very long time. I hope you can understand our desire for a good life and for money. Let’s not rush to criticise it. That is my opinion”.
He adds: “I believe Chinese culture, including Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism, is very balanced. It will lead people back to what they really need in their hearts. When people are rich enough, what they hope for will be different. At the beginning, a man wants to be rich, he wants to show off his wealth, it’s normal. But, gradually, he finds it’s quite boring. He will gradually find that inner spiritual balance is more important so he will turn to that.”
With that, the philosopher entrepreneur heads out, possibly to buy another famous name near you.
-------------------------------------------

Rise of a business empire

1992 Guo founds Guangxin Technology Development Company, a market research group, with classmates from Fudan University, using Rmb38,000 as the company’s founding capital. Guangxin subsequently takes a founding stake in Fosun Group.
1994 Expands investments to property and pharmaceuticals.
2004 Fosun International founded in Hong Kong, listed on main board of Hong Kong stock exchange in 2007.
2010 Acquires 7.1 per cent of Club Med, the first time a quoted Chinese group has taken a direct holding in a listed French company.
2012 Sets up joint venture Pramerica Fosun Life Insurance with Prudential Financial. Also invests in Minsheng Bank, China’s largest privately owned lender.
2014 Wins bidding war for an 80 per cent stake in Portugal’s largest insurance group, Caixa Seguros, for €1bn. Other investments include Malaysian restaurant chain Secret Recipe, and US film production venture Studio 8. Raises bid for Club Med.

2014年4月29日 星期二

復星國際

這幾年復星藉着擁有跨產業的營運經驗,內部管理得宜及有往績支持的投資能力,在國內國外算是建立了一定囗碑。

現在加上掌握了長期的低成本融資渠道,及剛遇著中國的'決定'改革,感覺上就像打通了仼督二脈之後的高手,不難預計復星在未來一段很長日子裡將會有排玩,值得期待。

若問爲何復星投資能力出衆,可能就是他們想得更多,睇得更遠。且看看以下的演講就會明白的。

.............................................................................................................................

郭广昌:学不了乔布斯 但可以学我做一个静悟者

2014-04-28中欧国际工商学院

來源:http://www.cn-healthcare.com/phone/20140428/phone-456978.html
编者按:在中欧国际工商学院二十周年校庆之际推出了“大师课堂”。邀请国内外顶尖学者与商界领袖共享智慧。这次为大家带来的是:复星集团董事长郭广昌先生演讲的摘编。
郭广昌:尊敬的刘吉院长,朱晓明院长,苏理达教务长,尊敬的张(维炯)教授,今天有点诚惶诚恐,因为我一定不是中欧的好学生,张院长也批评过好多次,的确也比较忙,有机会来这里跟大家报告,也不要我讲更多的我们收了哪个项目,做了哪个投资,我觉得还是跟大家报告一下在我做企业这么多年来,我觉得最重要的还是去听别人怎么说,尤其是跟别人讨论过程中,你怎么去学到一些东西。
最近我在回想,在这20多年和中国企业界的交流过程中,其实我在不少企业家身上学到了很多东西。所以,今天也借其中几次比较深的讨论,跟大家分享一下我从中得到启发。
第一次比较大的讨论,应该是跟王石关于所谓专业化和多元化的讨论。现在这个已经过去了,而且在这个讨论中大家都各自学到了些东西,包括万科开始投资银行了,也开始做很多别的项目。
当然,我觉得从我个人体会来说,这个讨论对我非常重要。其实这个讨论让我意识到,一个企业如果要做多个产业的运营,其实就已经是在做投资了。换句话说,多个产业的同时运营,不见得就一定不专业,比如你可以请这个行业里最优秀的人来做,这样是能做到专业的。所以说,选择以投资带动多元化的运营,你其实最重要的决定,就是要决定如何分散你的资源。
现在,复星意识到我们已经成为一个投资集团;接下来,复星应该去学习怎么样成为一个优秀的投资集团,这是我们最本职的一个工作。所以我们要一直思考,作为一个投资集团,什么是最重要的?答案是我们觉得作为一个投资集团,资金的来源是重要的,问题在于你如何让它变得更便宜?当然,人才来源也是非常重要的,还有对项目的敏感性也很重要,等等。但是,你自己的精力分配也非常重要。也就是说,如果说你是作为投资集团,然后你的核心团队整天还处在某个行业的运营当中,这样你就会陷入进去,反而把最重要的投资工作给忘了。也有一种说法,叫同心多元化,就是说你只有把一行做得特别优秀之后,再做别的才可能更好。但我不认同,因为其实真正把一业做得很长之后,它带来固有的观念和一些想法,恰恰会阻碍你在别的行业的投资。所以我觉得,作为一个投资集团涉足多行业是可行的,但是多行业对于产业运营来说肯定不可行。
对于复星这个投资集团来说,未来就是两个轮子:一个是我们要打造以保险为核心的综合金融能力,另外一个就是具有深厚产业基础的、植根于中国的全球投资能力,这是未来复星快速发展的目标和根本保证。
第二个,在企业管理这个层面对我来说影响很大的一个争论,是跟马云做的一个“不务正业”的事情——练太极拳。我和马云都打太极拳,我的老师也是他介绍的,但实际上两个人练习的方式,是各有其道的。我练的叫易太极,讲究的是准确性,讲究每个动作要到位,就像写毛笔字,一开始要一撇一揦,要慢慢通过准确性来打通经络,让自己经络畅通之后,才会气血畅通,才能够把真气练出来,这是一个过程。而马云不同,他的师傅是非常正宗的门派传人,再加上马云天性聪明,所以他直接从高处入手,一开始就讲究神、气相通,然后流畅,等等。所以我常常和他说,你不是用身体练太极,是在用思想练。
这样一个争论,让我想到了什么呢?我是想到了佛教界很有名的一个争论,就是关于顿悟和静悟的。也许上辈子做了很多修行的人,哪怕没有读书,但他很有悟性,也很有慧根,他也可以走顿悟的道路。也就是说他突然哪一天就明白了,就成佛了。但还有另外一种,天性比较愚钝,上辈子也没有好好修行,像我这样的该怎了么办呢?我们只好把目标定成每天进步一点点,不断的修行。可能这辈子成不了佛,但下辈子也许可以。所以我觉得,太极也是这样,不是说谁对谁错的问题,而是说你自己的禀赋怎么样,你自己的天性怎么样。
其实做企业,也是这样。有些人做企业可以走顿悟的道路,比如说马云、马化腾,他们找到一个商业模式,十年就变成一千多亿美金的市值。但是大家想想,是不是每个人都可以走这条路?是不是每个人都成得了乔布斯或者比尔·盖茨?我觉得不见得,因为像这些人,不是所有人都能学的。但是还有另外一条路大家可以学,就是像复星这样一步步的积累。因为复星起步是从一个“三无”企业开始的,那时候没资金、没技术、也没人才。虽然成功的快速程度和巨大程度跟马云、马化腾他们不能比,但是毕竟我可以一步步去做啊。同时,作为一个投资企业来说,我注意到了巴菲特,他是可以学习的。其实他说的那些话、做的那些事,都没有那么深奥,关键是你能不能坚持的去做。就像锻炼,其实大家都知道锻炼是好的,但是你能不能真的每天花精力,比如用20分钟打一遍易太极?所以关键是能不能坚持。
所以复星一直是一个静悟者,是一个在碰到瓶颈的情况下不断突破的过程。我们都知道,作为一个投资集团,很重要的一块就是资金的来源。1998年复星医药上市之后,我以为资金问题解决了,一边跟资本市场结合,一边找到好的投资机会,这两轮驱动也很完美。但是看上去很完美,而且我们在2004年之前的确做得很好。但其实这里面有两个问题:第一,中国资本市场的建设是不完善的,融资一次跟上市一次花的力气是差不多的;第二,中国缺少支持投资型企业的银行体系,银行大多数是短期借贷。所以,复星一方面要立足于做一个投资型企业,另一方面我们的金融系统也是不支持的。怎么办?尤其2004年之后,我们痛定思痛,一定要把我们的资金渠道打开。否则你成不了一流的投资集团。
那怎么办呢?我们用三年时间实现了复星国际在香港上市。上市我带来了什么呢?我们至少让我们具有了一个全球化的融资平台,而且为后面复星的全球化打下了一个良好的基础。但是即使这种情况下,我认为还是有些问题,这就是我们想做的事情,跟我们想拥有的资金资源之间还是有差距。所以之后我们就在思考,复星到底后面要走什么路线?我们要在哪些方面去突破?现在,我们觉得最重要的就是要在两个方面突破:第一个,就是在投资能力方面,我们已经有一个香港的平台,我们一定要往全球化去走。复星的很多项目已经在跟凯雷、黑石等等竞争,他们具有全球整合资源的能力,那如果复星没有,我们在竞争中就要处于劣势。我们当时想,我们要跟他们竞争的话,我们的优势在哪里?我们懂得中国,我们能够为全球的企业帮他在中国发展,我们的劣势在哪里?我们的劣势就是全球能力,全球眼光,全球组织资源的能力比较差。所以,我们必须要把这个劣势变成优势,所以我们提出了“中国动力嫁接全球资源”的战略,利用我们的优势去打击人家的劣势。
首先,我们更多是要帮助我们投资的企业在中国的增长。我相信在座的各位应该对复星都有些了解,比如说我们投资的FolliFollie、地中海俱乐部,我们真的努力帮他们在中国增长。而这种增长在实现的时候,就是我们最好的一个广告,这些企业就会帮复星去推广。所以现在当海外企业觉得需要一个中国投资者的时候,来找我们的人就特别多。这样的话,我们就可以在很多项目中优中选优。
再者,就是后来我们也有点知名度了,复星就面临着两种选择,一种选择是用自有资金继续发展,不去管别人的钱;另外一种选择,自己的资金不够,我们要不要管第三方的资金?在这种讨论中我们还是选择了一方面用好自有资金,另一方面我们要管理第三方资产。为什么?最初我们在进行全球化投资的时候,我们需要战略伙伴,需要更多的合作者跟我们在一起。比如复星非常重要的一个合作伙伴——美国保德信,给了我们5亿美金,再加上我们自己出1亿美金,成立了6亿美金的复星保德信基金进行全球投资,这是保德信单笔对外托管的最大一笔资金,这个基金是100%由复星来管。
虽然我们开始管理第三方资产,但是我觉得在复星这个投资集团的资金来源上,基金的模式是跟复星的投资战略、投资风格不匹配的,所以虽然我们发展第三方资产,但显然这是不可延续的。为什么不匹配呢?比如说基金,一般来说存续期是5到7年,在这之后必须要退出。为什么我愿意要保德信的钱?因为他给我的时间是10年+2年,够长,基本上是可以匹配我的投资战略的。第二个,我觉得管别人的钱,有点悖论:一是,对我的性格来说,管别人的钱跟自己的钱,我一定花的精力是一样的,但是管别人的钱有一个非常奥妙的事情,你管好了,基本上要分给人家,你管不好,别人就不让你管。



而且管别人的钱是在规定范围、规定时间做规定动作,蛮难的。所以我觉得最好的模式,还是管自己的钱。但是管自己的钱又不够,怎么办呢?所以我们现在走另一条路,就是尽管要做一部分第三方资产管理,但是复星的核心,还是要学习巴菲特模式,要打造复星的第二个轮子,就是以保险为核心的综合金融的轮子。实际上,所有的投资型公司里面,巴菲特模式一定是财富积累的速度、额度和规模最快的。为什么?原因很简单,一个是他的资金成本是负利率的,二个是他的投资又是长期的,三者他个人又活的时间比较长。第三点也很重要,因为他从事投资的时间长,不管他的IRR是多少,十年的积累和二十年、三十年或四十年的积累,肯定是不一样的。所以我觉得,巴菲特如果再活到100岁,那不得了。
所以复星下定决心,2007年以后,我们一定要打造我们自己的保险。我们投资了永安财险,我们在香港成立了鼎睿再保险,我们跟美国保德信成立了复星保德信寿险。更重要的,今年我们完成了对葡萄牙最大的保险公司的收购。这个收购,意味着复星现在3000亿资产里面,30%到40%的资产是来自于保险的。我想特别强调的是,因为复星的葡萄牙保险管理着近130亿欧元的资产,且现在主要配置在现金和国债上,这样如果复星我能够将他的资产进行一部分的提升的话,比如适当提高对房地产、股票权益类的比例,那么他的回报率就大大的提升。所以这跟我用别人的钱或是管理第三方资产相比,对复星更有利;当然,投资加报率提升对葡萄牙保险公司来说也更有利。因此,这就是一个有效的资源的嫁接,是完全符合整个复星集团的发展战略的。
所以我觉得对企业说回来,不管是用顿悟的方式还是用静悟的方式,不断完善、不断改进,都是非常重要的。
第三个,再跟大家汇报一下最近发生的一个,不是争论,而是私下一个讨论,但我觉得很有意思。前一个月李彦宏来上海,我们在聊天的时候突然聊到一个严肃的问题,就是人与机器的替代关系。李彦宏跟我讲一个道理,说是随着网络、计算机、科技以及生物医药大发展之后,未来机器一定会比人聪明。那时候我说机器老早就比人聪明了,比如说计算这些东西,但是我认为机器永远不可能代替人。为什么?因为人是有自由意志的,而机器再聪明也都是人赋予的。
讲这个事情什么意思呢?就是人是有自由意志的,是可以做不一定是出于完全自身利益考虑的选择。人的选择永远是充满不确定性,而不是说被设定的程序,而机器哪怕再聪明,它的选择也是唯一的。
那这个跟企业管理,有什么关系呢?最近我读了一篇文章,推荐大家也一定要看,马化腾写的,就是打造一个可以进化的生物组织。现在大家开始关注一个问题,就是到底什么样的企业组织是好的?我们企业组织是不是应该像计算机一样准确,没有混乱?还是说更像一个生物体,可能里面是有灰度的,是有混乱的。就像人这个生物体,可能每天都在产生癌细胞,但是我们的免疫系统把它消灭掉了,所以我们是做不到我们生物体没有癌细胞的。所以,我们的组织,是不是越稳定越均衡越好?最近很火的一本书叫《失控》,里面就有一句话,“均衡即死亡”。也就是说在高度完美、高度均衡之后,这个组织还有活力吗?所以,我们到底要打造一个什么样的组织?如果我们确定了一套东西可以管用一百年,怎么可能呢?我更倾向于企业要有活力,哪怕有一定混乱;反而最怕的,恰恰是看上去很完美,但其实已经完了。多少企业都死在最完美的时候?
我觉得马化腾最了不起的一件事情,我觉得他会比更多的海外高科技走得更远,什么原因?作为一个IT男,他有这种思维是很不容易的。如果没有他这种思维,我可以说就没有今天的微信,因为他允许了内部某种冲突的存在,微信不是他的主流做出来的,是所谓的一些非主流,一些有冲突的小团体做出来的,如果没有微信,马化腾自己说,那真的很危险。因为有了微信,让别人变得很危险。所以我觉得一定要有,复星也是这样。
归根到底我讲这些就一个意思,我觉得一个企业的活力,一定要让他保持一定的开放性、一定的灰度。这个真的大家可以看到,但关于这方面的思考,可能还刚刚开始,大家也可以一起讨论。谢谢大家!